Difference between Rawlsian and non Rawlsian idea of Justice

 1. Rawlsian and non-Rawlsian ideas of justice differ in their approaches to creating a just society.

2. Rawlsian justice is based on the idea of fairness, and emphasizes the importance of a social contract that ensures equal opportunities and access to resources for all members of society.

3. Non-Rawlsian ideas of justice often prioritize individual rights and liberties, with less emphasis on creating a fair distribution of resources or ensuring equal access to opportunities.

4. Rawlsian justice emphasizes the importance of democratic decision-making and a fair and open process for making decisions, while non-Rawlsian ideas of justice may place less emphasis on these processes.

5. Rawlsian justice recognizes the importance of a social safety net, which ensures that those who are disadvantaged or marginalized have access to the resources and support they need to participate fully in society. Non-Rawlsian ideas of justice may be more skeptical of such programs, seeing them as overly paternalistic or as interfering with individual liberty.

6. Rawlsian justice is often associated with the concept of "the veil of ignorance," which suggests that individuals would choose principles of justice that ensure basic liberties, equal opportunities, and a fair distribution of resources if they did not know their individual characteristics or biases. Non-Rawlsian ideas of justice may be less concerned with this thought experiment.

7. Rawlsian justice places a great deal of emphasis on reducing inequalities in society, and argues that these inequalities are justifiable only if they benefit everyone, especially the most vulnerable members of society. Non-Rawlsian ideas of justice may be less concerned with reducing inequalities, seeing them as a natural byproduct of the market or of individual effort.

8. Rawlsian justice has been influential in shaping debates about social policy, while non-Rawlsian ideas of justice may be more skeptical of the role of government in promoting equality or addressing social problems.

9. Rawlsian justice has been influential in debates about economic policy, with proponents of Rawlsian justice arguing for policies that prioritize the needs of the most vulnerable members of society. Non-Rawlsian ideas of justice may be more concerned with market efficiency or the protection of individual property rights.

10. Rawlsian justice has been criticized for being too abstract and disconnected from real-world political debates, while non-Rawlsian ideas of justice may be criticized for being too narrow or lacking a coherent philosophical foundation.

11. Rawlsian justice has influenced a range of political movements, including progressive movements that emphasize the importance of social welfare programs and policies that promote greater equality. Non-Rawlsian ideas of justice may be associated with more conservative or libertarian political movements.

12. Rawlsian justice emphasizes the importance of community and the common good, while non-Rawlsian ideas of justice may be more focused on individual self-interest.

13. Rawlsian justice has been influential in debates about global justice and the responsibilities of wealthy nations to address global inequalities. Non-Rawlsian ideas of justice may be less concerned with global inequality or may prioritize the interests of individual nations over the interests of the global community.

14. Rawlsian justice places a great deal of emphasis on the idea of fairness, while non-Rawlsian ideas of justice may be more concerned with other values, such as efficiency or individual liberty.

15. Rawlsian and non-Rawlsian ideas of justice continue to shape political debates and policies, and represent different approaches to creating a just society.